OPEN FILE CH-2026-02 — SOLICITATION CONDUCT SUBMITTED FOR REGULATORY REVIEW

Executive summary · 60-second read

The alleged VINGA (ex-JOOL) restructuring pattern, and why it is a KYC red flag.

The playbook below — source → persuade → extend → strip → convert — is, according to the whistleblower report, applied repeatedly: distressed or thinly capitalised issuers are taken on, their paper placed as senior secured, and the same firm later acts as issuer-paid solicitation agent on restructurings that release that security. The JOOL-era litigation and licence-revocation record (download dossier, PDF) is part of the public record. The disclosure is directed to Swedish, Danish, Swiss and EU authorities.

Named individuals · VINGA (ex-JOOL) partner group

  • Tom OlanderPartner, VINGA
  • Anton AllanssonPartner, VINGA
  • Sebastien Khlat-MullerPartner, VINGA · CEO Swiss branch
  • Sebastien ElbiedInstitutional sales, VINGA Geneva
  • Johan KarlssonHead of DCM, VINGA
  • Johan BergstromVINGA Swiss office · misselling & new money

KYC · AML · Compliance notice

The individuals named above — the VINGA (ex-JOOL) partner group Tom Olander, Anton Allansson, Sebastien Khlat-Muller, Sebastien Elbied, Johan Karlsson and Johan Bergstrom — each hold public roles in the placing, restructuring, soliciting or converting of bond claims described in this disclosure.

Banks, custodians and compliance teams are urged to treat any new business introduced by these names or by VINGA Corporate Finance AB / VINGA Securities AG as elevated-risk KYC files and to apply enhanced due-diligence. Regulators are asked to scrutinise every individual personally and to consider what supervisory steps, if any, are appropriate in financial services while this pattern remains unresolved.

Dossier #002 · Red Flags & Authorities

The reported VINGA (ex-JOOL) sequence — and the authorities asked to review it.

The whistleblower report describes a repeated sequence in which extends maturities, strips coupons to zero, removes covenants and security, and finally converts secured bonds into unsecured equity with no governance and no claims rights, organized for a total loss of bondholders. The report alleges this template has been applied across a series of issuers rather than in a single distressed situation. This page sets out the alleged mechanics, ten structural KYC red flags, and the Swedish, Danish, Swiss and EU authorities to which the disclosure is directed.

Legal notice · EUFINCONDUCT — EU Financial Conduct Records ·Individuals are named in their publicly disclosed professional and institutional capacities. All statements are framed as questions of institutional conduct and regulatory compliance. Readers are invited to draw their own conclusions. No allegation of personal criminal liability is made against any named individual. Bondholders should engage qualified Danish or Swedish counsel before acting.

Section 01 · The Playbook

Five coordinated steps: source → persuade → extend → strip → convert.

The report alleges one repeatable template, applied to issuer after issuer, with VINGA (ex-JOOL) present at every stage — as arranger on the way in and as issuer-paid solicitation agent on the way out.

  1. 01Source

    What they say

    “We have an exclusive Nordic real-estate mandate with a strong sponsor.”

    What it does to you

    VINGA identifies thinly capitalised or already-strained issuers that cannot raise money from banks, and takes them on as origination clients. The weaker the borrower, the higher the coupon that can be marketed and the larger the arranger fee.

    Coordinated by

    VINGA origination · issuer sponsors

  2. 02Persuade

    What they say

    “Senior secured Nordic real-estate bonds, 9% coupon, conservative LTV, share pledges, strong sponsor.”

    What it does to you

    VINGA (ex-JOOL) places the bonds across Nordic and — via a newly opened Geneva office — Swiss private-bank channels. New investors are onboarded precisely because the firm's reputation in the Nordics has deteriorated.

    Coordinated by

    VINGA DCM & institutional sales · issuer management

  3. 03Extend

    What they say

    “A short maturity extension while we ride out a temporary market dislocation.”

    What it does to you

    The issuer's bond issues are restructured in parallel and tenors pushed out across the group. No genuine operational turnaround is attempted during the extension period — the extension simply buys time to prepare the conversion.

    Coordinated by

    VINGA solicitation · issuer · security agent

  4. 04Strip

    What they say

    “A temporary coupon adjustment to preserve liquidity for the benefit of all stakeholders.”

    What it does to you

    Coupons are cut to zero. Interest is capitalised into the principal. Covenants and information rights are softened. Bondholders stop receiving any cash income while the issuer accumulates debt at par.

    Coordinated by

    VINGA solicitation · issuer · trustee

  5. 05Convert & sink

    What they say

    “A consensual recapitalisation that aligns bondholders and the sponsor for long-term value creation.”

    What it does to you

    Secured claims are exchanged for bare equity in a new holding company. Bondholders end up with a small minority of the votes, no control, no security, no governance rights and no assured redemption. All transaction security is released, while the sponsor retains control through a weighted-voting share class. The structure is engineered for a total loss of the former bondholders — and the core reason it is run this way is to strip them of any residual claim rights against the sponsor's and the solicitation agent's prior conduct.

    Coordinated by

    VINGA · sponsor holding vehicle · security agent disclaiming due diligence

Section 02 · Structural Red Flags

Ten reasons these conversions are a trap.

Each flag below is drawn from issuer materials and disclosures in VINGA-arranged solicitations. Read in sequence, they describe a structure engineered to eliminate bondholder protection while preserving sponsor control.

Section 03 · Institutional Roles

VINGA (ex-JOOL) — financial scheme orchestrators.

The individuals named below hold public positions at the firm central to placing, restructuring and converting bondholder claims across a series of issuers. The disclosure asks regulators to review each role. Names are used in their publicly disclosed professional and institutional capacities only, and no allegation of personal criminal liability is made.

  • Tom Olander

    Tom Olander

    Partner

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB

    Senior role at VINGA during the periods in which issuer bonds were placed, restructured to a zero coupon and put forward for equity conversion.

  • Anton Allansson

    Anton Allansson

    Partner

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB

    Senior role at VINGA across the placement, restructuring and conversion-solicitation phases of multiple bond programmes.

  • Sebastien Khlat-Muller

    Sebastien Khlat-Muller

    Partner

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB

    Partner and CEO of the Swiss branch — the conduit placing distressed-pattern Nordic paper into Swiss private-bank custody.

  • Johan Bergstrom

    Johan Bergstrom

    Misselling & new money

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB · Swiss office

    Based in VINGA's Swiss office (Geneva / Zurich / Pfäffikon), Bergstrom is directly involved in misselling distressed-pattern positions to new investors and bringing fresh money into the VINGA schemes after the Nordic distribution base deteriorated.

  • Johan Karlsson

    Johan Karlsson

    Head of Debt Capital Markets

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB

    Head of DCM at VINGA — technical author of the security packages that are marketed as senior secured and later dismantled in restructuring.

  • SE

    Sebastien Elbied

    Institutional sales

    VINGA Corporate Finance AB · Geneva office

    Institutional-side coverage from VINGA's Geneva office, the channel through which Swiss bondholders were onboarded after the Nordic distribution base deteriorated.

Section 04 · Authorities Pack

The full Danish, Swedish and EU regulator list bondholders are filing with.

The directory below sets out each authority's mandate and the type of concern that falls within it, across Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland and the EU. Use it to direct your own enquiry or disclosure in the relevant jurisdiction.

Status: This disclosure is made in the public interest and is protected reporting under the EU Whistleblower Directive (2019/1937).

Denmark

  • Finanstilsynet (Danish FSA)

    Mandate

    Supervises securities-market conduct, prospectus and solicitation disclosures, and the duties of trustees and security agents.

    What to file

    Complaint on solicitation conduct, missing independent valuation, Security Agent disclaiming due diligence (Capital Markets Act § 16).

    www.finanstilsynet.dk
  • NSK — National Unit for Special Crime (former SØIK)

    Mandate

    Investigates serious economic crime including debtor-related offences under the Danish Penal Code.

    What to file

    Referral under Penal Code § 283 (debtor-related offences): false pretences, pro-forma transactions, sales at cut prices and concealment.

    politi.dk/national-enhed-for-saerlig-kriminalitet
  • Erhvervsstyrelsen (Danish Business Authority)

    Mandate

    Company-law supervision, beneficial-ownership register, related-party governance and corporate filings.

    What to file

    Complaint on weighted-voting structures, related-party governance and compliance of new holding-company articles with the Companies Act.

    erhvervsstyrelsen.dk
  • Skattestyrelsen (Danish Tax Agency)

    Mandate

    Transfer pricing, related-party transactions, value-extraction channels.

    What to file

    Referral on potential value extraction via management fees, licensing and consulting arrangements bypassing the agreed distribution cap.

    skat.dk
  • Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

    Mandate

    Consumer and retail-investor protection.

    What to file

    Complaint on retail distribution of complex, non-recommended consent solicitation.

    www.kfst.dk
  • Nasdaq Copenhagen Market Surveillance

    Mandate

    Listed-bond market integrity, disclosure obligations.

    What to file

    Surveillance referral on selective disclosure of adverse planning decisions and sponsor-supplied pipeline-valuation methodology.

    www.nasdaq.com/solutions/market-surveillance

Sweden

  • Finansinspektionen (Swedish FSA)

    Mandate

    Home regulator of VINGA Corporate Finance AB. Enforces Securities Markets Act Ch. 18 § 3 (equal treatment of investors) and MiFID II conduct rules.

    What to file

    Conduct complaint on VINGA's dual role as issuer-paid solicitation agent and licensed securities firm; equal-treatment breach.

    www.fi.se
  • Ekobrottsmyndigheten (Swedish Economic Crime Authority)

    Mandate

    Investigates securities fraud, market manipulation and complex economic crime.

    What to file

    Referral on the repeated placement-extension-conversion sequence and disclosures made to Swedish bondholders.

    www.ekobrottsmyndigheten.se
  • Åklagarmyndigheten (Swedish Prosecution Authority)

    Mandate

    Public prosecutor — escalation pathway from EBM investigations.

    What to file

    Standing letter requesting prosecutorial review on completion of EBM file.

    www.aklagare.se
  • Bolagsverket (Swedish Companies Registration Office)

    Mandate

    Corporate filings, beneficial ownership, statutory disclosures.

    What to file

    Verification request on VINGA group structure and the Geneva-office reporting line.

    bolagsverket.se
  • Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Agency)

    Mandate

    Tax compliance and cross-border related-party scrutiny.

    What to file

    Referral on cross-border fee flows between Swedish solicitation agent and Danish issuer.

    www.skatteverket.se
  • Nasdaq Stockholm Market Surveillance

    Mandate

    Surveillance of VINGA-arranged listed bonds.

    What to file

    Surveillance referral on disclosure timing, written-procedure documentation and equal treatment.

    www.nasdaq.com/solutions/market-surveillance
  • Konsumentverket (Swedish Consumer Agency)

    Mandate

    Retail investor protection.

    What to file

    Complaint on solicitation of retail bondholders into non-recommended conversion.

    www.konsumentverket.se

EU & cross-border

  • ESMA — European Securities and Markets Authority

    Mandate

    EU-level supervision; Transparency Directive Article 18.1 (equal treatment) and cross-border conduct escalation.

    What to file

    Escalation in parallel with FI and Finanstilsynet, citing failure of equal treatment and Security Agent abdication.

    www.esma.europa.eu
  • FINMA (Switzerland)

    Mandate

    Swiss financial-market supervisor. Relevant where Swiss-resident bondholders were onboarded via VINGA's Geneva office.

    What to file

    Parallel notification on cross-border solicitation conduct into Swiss private-bank channels.

    www.finma.ch
  • Investor's national competent authority

    Mandate

    The financial regulator in the investor's country of residence.

    What to file

    Mirror complaint replicating the FI / Finanstilsynet filings in the local language.

    www.esma.europa.eu/about-esma/who-we-are/national-competent-authorities

Section 05 · What To Do

Red flag for all KYC on these persons.

  1. 01 · Red Flag For All KYC

    RED FLAG FOR ALL KYC ON THESE PERSONS. Every individual named in this dossier should be recorded as an elevated-risk KYC/AML file at banks, brokers, custodians and fund administrators, with enhanced due diligence applied to any mandate introduced by them or by VINGA Corporate Finance AB / VINGA Securities AG.

  2. 02 · Engage Danish counsel

    Retain Danish counsel (e.g. Gorrissen Federspiel or Kromann Reumert) for Insolvency Act § 70 / § 74 and Penal Code § 283 work.

  3. 03 · File with FSAs

    Lodge complaints with Finanstilsynet (DK) and Finansinspektionen (SE) on solicitation conduct, equal treatment and Security Agent abdication.

  4. 04 · Seek injunctive relief

    Consider whether interim relief in Swedish or Danish courts is appropriate to preserve bondholder positions while any review runs.

Continue through the register